Do cabbage leaves really help to relieve engorgement?

cabbageCabbage leaves have long been touted as a treatment for engorged breasts. Slipping a couple inside your bra might stain your clothes and make you smell a bit funny, but surely that’s a small price to pay for the relief they’ll provide? Encouragingly, a quick perusal of the internet suggests there is medical evidence that they work. Several sites, including some written by doctors, cite studies that purport to demonstrate their effectiveness in lessening the discomfort of an extra-full bosom.

Like most breastfeeding mothers, I have suffered from my fair share of milk over-supply problems, particularly when C started to sleep longer at night. Would a trip to the greengrocers have helped? Past experience had taught me not to simply take a website’s word for it, so I decided to do some investigating of my own.

A study in medical journal Birth is widely reported as providing evidence supporting the use of cabbage leaves for engorgement1. The experiment involved 120 mothers, who took part in the research during their post-partum hospital stay. 60 of the women applied cabbage leaves after a feed, leaving them in place until they had reached body temperature. This process was repeated for a total of four feeds, and after each application the women were asked to report whether they felt their breasts were engorged. A control group of 60 women, who did not use cabbage leaves, were also asked to report whether their breasts were engorged. The percentage of women who reported experiencing engorgement went as follows:

  • after the 1st feed, 54% of the cabbage group and 52% of the control group;
  • after the 2nd feed, 51% of the cabbage group and 57% of the control group;
  • after the 3rd feed, 49% of the cabbage group and 51% of the control group;
  • after the 4th feed, 54% of the cabbage group and 59% of the control group.

To at least one medical professional (see above), these figures apparently amount to women saying they ‘experienced greater relief’ when using the leaves. It’s actually pretty obvious that they say no such thing. The difference between the two groups is very small indeed, and it is not statistically significant, so the only appropriate conclusion is that there is no support for the hypothesis that cabbage leaves prevent engorgement.

The authors performed a follow-up 6 weeks later, documenting the length of time for which women exclusively breast fed, and found that it was significantly longer for women who were in the cabbage leaf treatment group: they breastfed exclusively for an average of 36 days, compared to 30 in the control group. (They also mentioned that in the cabbage group fewer women stopped breastfeeding in the first week, and that more were breastfeeding at this point, although neither of these differences was significant.) Why might this be? Because these ladies applied cabbage leaves for a few hours shortly after their babies were born? The authors think this is unlikely. They conclude in their discussion:

‘…we cannot rule out the possibility that cabbage leaves had a direct effect on breast engorgement, and that this may have contributed to the increased breastfeeding success in the experimental group. However, we consider that the positive effect was more likely to have been mediated by psychological mechanisms.’

So, rather than the cabbage leaves containing something that encourages or enables women to breastfeed for longer (and, as you may have noticed, exclusive breastfeeding rates in both groups were considerably lower than the current recommendations), the difference was probably down to the psychological feel-good factor of having received treatment.

Several other studies have examined the effects of cabbage leaves in various ways, in an attempt to work out why exactly they are believed to relieve engorgement. One hypothesis is that they are cooling. The results of one study support this: an experiment comparing chilled gelpaks with chilled cabbage leaves found them to be equally effective at relieving pain2. By contrast, another study found that in fact chilling made no difference, and that room temperature cabbage leaves were just as good3. In both cases, the lack of a control group meant that the relatively small improvements reported by the mothers could simply be due to the placebo effect or natural remission of the condition (the problem lessening over time), a fact acknowledged by the authors.

There are two further problems with these studies: firstly, they relied on subjective reports of pain, rather than an objective measure of physical engorgement; secondly, they failed to monitor the effect that feeding had on engorgement. A trial assessing the effectiveness of cabbage leaf extract addressed these issues, with interesting results4. Two creams, one containing the cabbage leaf extract and one acting as a control, reduced self reports of pain and hardness of breast tissue (measured using a device called a Roberts Durometer) by a small amount. There was no difference between the groups: whether or not the cream contained cabbage extract made no difference to the results. Yet again, we have evidence of a potential placebo effect: the mere fact of treatment, whatever it was, appeared to reduce symptoms. The women fed their babies, and the measurements were taken again. This produced a much greater reduction in reported pain and breast hardness, leading the authors to conclude that the best course of action for relieving engorgement is frequent feeding.

So, it seems the evidence for the effectiveness of cabbage leaves is virtually non-existent. No one has yet been able to elucidate how they might work, and every study conducted so far has concluded that positive results are more likely to be due to the psychological impact of medical attention than a magical property of the cabbage. Applying them may be of limited psychological benefit (as much as using a placebo cream or chilled gelpak) but it does not seem appropriate for medical professionals to recommend them, particularly when a much better course of action is simply to feed your baby. As Roberts, Reiter and Schuster conclude in their cabbage leaf extract paper, ‘until a scientific foundation for their action is established, their use remains questionable’4.

  1. Birth. 1993 Jun;20(2):61-4.
  2. J Hum Lact. 1995 Mar;11(1):17-20.
  3. J Hum Lact. 1995 Sep;11(3):191-4.
  4. J Hum Lact. 1998 Sep;14(3):231-6.

Nipple shields: always a bad thing?

drawing of baby on scalesI have spoken to many mothers, including two midwives, who have used shields to ease nipple pain while they are breastfeeding without any apparent problems for their babies. Although they have been described (in the words of one mother) as ‘a godsend – the thing that made breastfeeding bearable for me,’ they are not recommended by the National Health Service.

What’s the problem with using nipple shields? Well, an NHS Primary Care Trust Breastfeeding Policy document cites two studies demonstrating slower milk transfer when using a shield1,2.

The trouble with this research is that it was conducted over 25 years ago, and shields have moved on in that time. A more recent study (published in 2006) test-weighed babies after feeding with or without a thin silicone shield and found that there wasn’t any difference in their milk intake3. The same article reports the results of a survey of mothers’ attitudes to using nipple shields and found evidence that they actually help to prevent early breastfeeding termination, rather than cause it. Another survey of shield use found that 86% of women utilizing them felt that they allowed them to continue breastfeeding when they might otherwise have given up4.

One study investigating the impact of a number of factors on nursing duration initially appeared to link using a nipple shield in hospital with a greater risk of discontinuing breastfeeding5. When other factors known to affect breastfeeding duration (such as the type of delivery the mother had and whether she smoked) were taken into account, however, the relationship between shield use and early weaning declined to the extent it was no longer statistically significant.

It has been suggested that using a shield from very early on could cause nipple confusion, meaning your baby wouldn’t want/be able to feed directly from the breast. An instance of this was reported in a case study more than 20 ago, which described a baby who refused to latch normally onto the breast, having been taught to attach with a rubber bottle teat covering the nipple6. This case study, which doesn’t even really demonstrate the problem – a bottle teat is quite different to a modern shield – appears to be the only recorded evidence for shield related nipple confusion. According to an article recommending shields for feeding premature babies (a situation in which they have been shown to be very useful), ‘the term “nipple/teat” confusion remains a hypothesis,’ i.e. it might be a problem, but there isn’t yet any strong evidence to support it7.

Using a nipple shield won’t necessarily be trouble-free: you have the hassle of cleaning, sterilizing and applying it before each use, not to mention remembering it when you go out. Despite these drawbacks, some mothers undoubtedly find shields very helpful. Women who choose to use them are already experiencing breastfeeding difficulties, such as nipple or latch problems, and are therefore at greater risk of stopping anyway8. When the alternative to a nipple shield is a bottle, perhaps trying one isn’t such a bad idea after all.

  1. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;66(1):47-51.
  2. Early Hum Dev. 1980 Dec;4(4):357-64.
  3. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Mar-Apr;35(2):265-72.
  4. J Hum Lact. 1996 Dec;12(4):291-7.
  5. Midwifery. 2008 Mar;24(1):55-61.
  6. J Hum Lact. 1986 ;2(1):28-30.
  7. Infant. 2005 ;1(4):111-115.
  8. J Hum Lact. 2004 Aug;20(3):327-34.

Using formula might stop you sleeping at night

bed

One of the common myths perpetuated about breastfeeding is that it causes your baby (and you) to sleep less soundly at night. Formula is said to be heavier and harder to digest, knocking your baby out for longer, whilst ‘weaker’ breast milk just isn’t as satisfying. A friend of mine was criticized for not using formula (by her mother, of all people) for this very reason. I’ve met lots of breastfeeding mothers who are doing fine sleep-wise, and bottle feeding ones who are knackered, and have always thought this was nonsense, so I was happy to hear recently about some research that confirms what I always expected1.

The study examined the sleeping patterns of 133 parents of three month old babies over a 48 hour period. The parents were asked to report how much sleep they got, while the actual amount was measured using a special device called a wrist actiograph. Mothers who breastfed exclusively reported getting a greater amount of sleep than those who supplemented with formula at night, and the actiograph confirmed that they did indeed get on average an extra 40-45 minutes. As it can take a while to prepare formula, this isn’t entirely surprising – the extra time might be due to the fact of having to make up the bottle. Here’s the really interesting thing, though: mothers whose partners shared the night feeds (in theory allowing them to sleep longer) STILL slept less than mothers exclusively breastfeeding. It seems that when the baby wakes, the mother does too (thanks, biology!) and when she doesn’t need to feed the baby, she instead lies there worrying about whether her partner is doing it properly… So, although the results confirm how hard it is for mothers to sleep easily (even if they have a partner willing to help out), they are very encouraging for breastfeeders – an extra 40 minutes can make a BIG difference!

  1. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2007 Jul-Sep;21(3):200-6.

Is lanolin cream a waste of money?

ointments_photoGiven the high incidence of nipple pain (it seems most women experience it when they start breastfeeding1), it would be reassuring to know that something can be done to relieve it. At the breastfeeding antenatal class the midwife told us that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of most nipple creams, although there have been studies showing that Lansinoh (commercially available purified lanolin) helps, and this is the one to go for if you have a problem. This view was echoed by two other midwives (one of whom gave me some sachets) and an NCT breastfeeding counsellor. You can read about my experience of using this preparation in the nipple solutions 1 journal post, but suffice to say that it didn’t work for me.

So, what is the scientific evidence for the effectiveness of lanolin? Probably the first thing to mention is that most of the big brand off-the-shelf nipple creams are simply moisturizers, and as the midwife said, there aren’t any published clinical trials supporting their effectiveness. On top of this, most of them aren’t even safe to go in babies’ mouths, so have you have to clean them off first – not ideal. This isn’t the case for Lansinoh – as it is simply purified lanolin, it isn’t a problem if babies swallow it (although this in itself doesn’t mean it’s worth using, of course).

An article looking at various topical treatments for nipple pain reviews several studies testing the effectiveness of lanolin1. When compared with hydrogel dressings (designed to maintain a moist wound healing environment), lanolin does well. In one study, women treated with lanolin reported significantly less nipple pain and were less likely to suffer from infection than those using the dressings. In another, there was no difference in pain relief, but there were still fewer infections in the lanolin group. Evidence that lanolin is a useful treatment? Not necessarily. As neither of these studies had a control group where no treatment was given, all we can tell is that hydrogel dressings are a bad idea. A study looking at the effect of heat treatment (sunshine or heat lamps) suffers from a similar problem. Using lanolin with the heat treatment offered greater pain relief than using the heat treatment alone, but unfortunately there is no way of telling whether this is better than not using any treatment at all.

In fact, the three studies in the review that compared lanolin with a ‘no treatment’ baseline showed it to be no more effective than leaving the nipples alone. There is also evidence that lanolin offers no improvement over rubbing on expressed milk (which is also reported as being pretty useless at reducing pain). The article also reports some preliminary research indicating that glycerin gel is a better treatment for sore nipples than lanolin (although a later study has found no difference between the two2.

Two further studies also deserve a mention. One provides evidence that peppermint gel is better at preventing nipple cracks and pain than lanolin or a placebo gel3. Another shows that in certain circumstances applying lanolin not only offers no improvement, but might actually make things worse4. The study compared using lanolin cream or breast milk with not using a treatment. The results showed that the appearance of nipple wounds (cracks and fissures) was the same in each group. However, the women who applied breast milk or used no topical treatment recovered significantly faster than those using lanolin.

So, it seems you may be better off ignoring the health professionals’ advice to use a lanolin cream. If you want to keep your nipples trauma-free you may want to think about using peppermint gel, or alternatively go for the inexpensive option of not bothering to treat them at all.

  1. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2005 Jul-Aug;34(4):428-37.
  2. J Perinat Educ. 2004 Winter;13(1):29-35.
  3. Med Sci Monit. 2007 Sep;13(9):CR406-411
  4. Saudi Med J. 2005 Aug; 26(8):1231-4.

Does pale skin mean problem nipples?

test tubes and tape measureOne of the anecdotes you may have heard (particularly if you are pale) is that women with fair skin are more likely to experience sore or damaged nipples. If you have very light skin and painful nipples (as I did), it may be strangely reassuring to be able to attribute at least some of the difficulties you’re experiencing to your colouring. On the other hand, if you have dark skin and sore nipples, you may simply view this kind of statement as irritating nonsense.

Is there any evidence that skin colour is associated with nipple problems when breastfeeding? There don’t seem to be any studies looking solely at the relationship between the two, but there are some studies that have included it as a factor, and the results they report are mixed. Whilst one study looking at breastfeeding in the first few days after birth found an association between nipple damage and skin colour1, another found that there was no link between the two2.

To confuse matters further, some research looking at the effect of ‘conditioning’ nipples prior to breastfeeding (by rubbing them with a rough towel – ouch!) found that women with fair skin reported significantly more pain when feeding on the unconditioned nipple, and olive skinned women reported significantly more pain when feeding on the conditioned nipple3. (I should mention that this research was carried out in 1979 – actively damaging you nipples whilst pregnant to ‘toughen them up’ for breastfeeding is no longer recommended.)

So, it seems the jury’s still out on this one. I suppose the most important thing to remember is that whilst there may be some link between fair skin and nipple pain or damage when breastfeeding, there certainly isn’t conclusive evidence for this, and there definitely are reports from women of all skin types that breastfeeding can be very painful!

  1. Rev Bras Enferm. 2005 Sep-Oct;58(5):529-34
  2. Birth. 1987 Mar;14(1):41-5.
  3. Nurs Res. 1979 Sep-Oct;28(5):267-71